7 Comments
User's avatar
Angela's avatar

I know why the Brits wouldn't allow the States to use their airfields. It's because the U.k. is already under attack by Islamists & they're losing the war. If they approved the U.S. to use their airfields, their country would really go up in smoke 'cuz the Muslims will go crazy. Besides, the U.K. is already a lost country; the Islamists have pretty much taken over. Thus the reason why their horrible PM refuses to support this. He already has issues with the Islamists, murderers, rapists et al.

Brian's avatar

The scary part here is under Carney and the Lieberals what's happening in the UK could be a precursor for Canada. Carney and Starmer are two apples from the same tree. We should be watching this very closely. I'm sure the US is!

mike's avatar

Carney will ship oil to China.

Yoel Yonan's avatar

what are you doing interviewing that walrus/bolton traitor

Geoff Moore's avatar

Garbage post. This is General Rick Hillier, probably the most popular and best leader in recent Canadian Armed Forces history.

Tony Ledsham's avatar

What a buffoon! Read some history Hillier!

“The CIA has for the first time acknowledged that the 1953 coup it backed in Iran that overthrew its prime

minister and cemented the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi was undemocratic.

The admission came in a new podcast revealing details about one of the most famed CIA operations of all

times – the effort to spirit six American diplomats out of Iran under the guise of a Hollywood movie production.

The CIA in 2013 admitted its role in the coup that brought down Iran’s then prime minister, Mohammad

Mosaddeq, but until now has not publicly acknowledged that the move was undemocratic.

Much of the agency’s official history of the coup remains classified, complicating the public’s understanding

of an event that still resonates, as tensions remain high between Tehran and Washington.“

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/sites/default/files/2023-10/2023-10-13-cia_admits_1953_iranian_coup_it_backed_was_undemocratic_us_foreign_policy_the_guardian.pdf

David's avatar

Wow .. so yes, this has always been obvious .. but what is your knowledge that you would try to demean a man of Hiller's stature? What have you done that makes you more knowledgeable then someone who has lived it? At what level were you serving that makes you a better commentator?