24 Comments
User's avatar
Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

Maybe he’s just MORE of an incompetent clown than considered?

The last one was a bad actor, and his puppeteer replacement is an even worse charlatan looter.

‘Mean’ is good misdirection from total fraud disclosure by the incompetent and cowardly invested with illegitimate power.

Sarah's avatar

i couldn't have responded better myself! 👏🏻👏🏻

Christine Barnett's avatar

Carney might be realizing that he’s out of his element when not directing in a boardroom. This is a country he’s directing with actual human beings, not AI agendas and digital control dominant corporations. He WILL fail. But will Canada fail too.

Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

Plus, he is a documented academic plagiarist, fast-tracked to do the financial bidding of his oligarchic masters, so one would suspect that cowardly obedience is symptomatic of both avarice and self-serving ignorance.

A low IQ and an accompanying delusional arrogance is likely a feature pack for success in such servile environs.

Less ‘fox in the chicken coop’ and more instinctive weasel perhaps

Clair de Luna's avatar

He possesses arrogance at its finest.

jacklynw's avatar

Carney's facial expressions, body language and responses (or lack thereof) to anyone who questions him is a clear indication that he has a "mean" disposition. His experience is in the private sector where people likely bowed down to him. Sickening! He's destroying Canada.

Scott Newell's avatar

Mean. This guy is the biggest wimp child sitting in the corner that can’t tie his skates !!

He is just pure Sociopathic Evil

John Powell's avatar

BITD Maurice Strong was revered as a Canadian “ strong man”. Whatever his political talents BITD, one thing was for sure: If you dared to contradict Mr Strong , you were immediately banished. Gone.

In today’s age, bullies have been venerated as liberal Visionaries, declaring that there is no place for hate in our society.

Don’t you dare contradict Carney.

That’s a hate crime.

Sandra D Barber's avatar

All peoples have their own opinions and this is mine, whatever it is worth. I have lived a few more years to look at this in what I deem a realistic perspective. Most of us are at best, good living, ordinary people who have worked hard all of their lives and take NOTHING for granted, in particular the 3 essentials for life, water, food and shelter, and a way (job) to provide those. Now, Mark Carney is a wealthy person, well educated, well travelled and supposedly respected. However, he is a member of the WEF (World Economic Forum), who seem to me think they know what is best for everyone, yet he has proved countless times that he has not a CLUE about necessities. His business acumen is ZERO, and the FACT that the only thing that he and others do is to SPEND BORROWED MONEY ON THE BACKS OF FUTURE GENERATIONS to ensure that NET ZERO IS ACCOMPLISHED BY 2050 is ludicrous. MEAN?? Wow? Feelings and running a country should not be used in the same sentence. Since he has proven that it is his way or the highway-same as his predecessor, please prove to us all exactly what has he done? except drive investment out of Canada, alienate our nearest forever neighbor, like him or not. Action, not useless words. And Canada now?? Doomed. Yes, Pierre Poilievre can turn things around!!

Maria P.'s avatar

Frankly, Poilievre must be doing something right as im seeing the hit pieces again. I would like him to be authentic and to stop with the stupid alliterations and rinse/repeat statements. I wonder if the main stream media will start calling Carney a "d*ck" like they did with Poilievre.

Donald Ashman's avatar

If I were advising Pierre Poilievre, I would do three things this summer: 1) I would hit the road with my family intact and meet, shake hands, convene, interact, and schmooze my tail off at as many EDA events as possible. Mr. Poilievre is a warm, considerate and charming fellow; work that to the maximum.

2) any criticism of the Liberals or Mr. Carney or the Country would come from other MPs that I am trying mentor and bring forward. Conservatives have a superior bench; I would let those folks off the leash a little more. Set the tone, delegate, move forward.

3) finally, I would make healthcare my sole, Prime Ministerial policy initiative. The Health Act of 1984 has to go. Melissa Lantsman can take affordability. Andrew Lawton can take gun control. Michael Chong Foreign Affairs. Larry Brock takes the Justice/Lawlwssness file. Sandra Cobena can take economics or finance, or taxation. Ms. Rempel-Garner has immigration. I would spend the summer building quiet support for a complete overhaul of the healthcare system in favour of a hybrid public/private model.

Liz Innes's avatar

His performance at the gay pride parade in Toronto was completely cringe worthy. I have rarely been more embarrassed for someone. He made a total fool out of himself and embarrassed the country.

The Maple Leaf Patriot's avatar

It’s going to take a while for Pierre’s polling numbers to get better. Great things take time. The NDP will recover by taking away the environmentalists and pro Palestine people from the liberal base. Frustrated business liberals will move towards Polievre. It’s all a matter of time.

Tershia's avatar

If it weren’t for all the deaf, dumb and blind Canadian voters, we would not be saddled with such a wannabe dictator with a Napoleon complex.

“Every nation has the government it deserves.” Joseph de Maistre 1753-1822

Merla Parker's avatar

Napoleon complex-accurate!

Mike Canary's avatar

According to “Team Canada” the opposition leader should not oppose anything in Canada. This is bad enough, but read the comments - pure anger, hatred, bordering on insanity. When the hell did so many Canadians lose their sense of reason, fairness, and become like this? We will not survive much longer as a country unless this hatred stops.

https://substack.com/@arlenedickinson/note/c-284670599?r=x5pfu&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Steve Benediktson's avatar

Mark Carney is bringing "real" back. Trudeau was an actor, in way over his head, and a spoilt "man-child".

Clayton Oberg's avatar

As it applies to destructive climate policies that strikes me as correct. For Trudeau it was just the current trend, one among many. Carney is dead serious in his attacks on Canada's most productive industry as his personal wealth is tightly tied to a politically imposed artificial price on carbon.

Kimmer's avatar

That was Sarcasm RIGHT!🤣😂🤣

jacklynw's avatar

What are you smokin'?

jimmmy's avatar

Tasha been dining on the retard sandwiches? The federal bailout to buy expensive condos in BC is a 'good thing'? They are only 'expensive' because the developers have not REDUCED the prices to be attractive enough to buy a ?400 sqft condo - aka a unit not fit for purpose. Eby is too dumb to understand that 'buying on liquidation isn't a bailout' - these condos are not being liquidated. We all know that the stuff in a liquidation store has been marked down 30%, 40%, 50% + to make the price attractive enough for someone to buy. Tax payer BAILOUT money will be buying these condos from developers at market prices so that developers are RESCUED from incurring a painful hoop-hurting lo$$ (which is the way that markets are suppose to work). No average Canadian gets a bailout when they buy a house at a high price and need to figure out how to pay the mortgage after they loose their job - where is their rescue?

The Maple Leaf Patriot's avatar

It’s going to take a while for Pierre’s polling numbers to get better. Great things take time. The NDP will recover by taking away the environmentalists and pro Palestine people from the liberal base. Frustrated business liberals will move towards Polievre. It’s all a matter of time.

Donald Ashman's avatar

I listened to the podcast yesterday, and I thought it excellent.

The two guests were superb.

One quibble I had with Tara was during the discussion of Avi Lewis, “AviMania”, and the electoral consequences for the Conservatives: that is, the idea that the NDP could win back “hard hat” votes from the Conservatives, and hard left votes from disenchanted Liberals.

I can honestly say that no one is talking up Avi Lewis with any success in my area of Ontario.

Those young folks of which Tara speaks are far less ideological, and far more practical than that for which they are credited. They just want the Country to function properly again.

Here is a scenario I kind of played out in my head: suppose Doug Ford steps down before the next election. Suppose Caroline Mulroney takes a stab at the leadership and wins.

No more buffoonish behaviour, no more ignoring the concerns that affect real Ontarians, and a closer, brighter relationship between the Ontario PCs and the federal Conservatives.

Suppose the NDP captures a greater portion of the nutty left, hard core, social democratic, climate alarmist, antisemitic Canadian vote; the picture could change very quickly for the better for principled conservatives, Conservatives, and for Canada.